It has become apparent that catching problems at the UAT - or even worse the Systems Integration level is too expensive. If a software bug or code error is fixed at the developer level, it could be estimated that it costs $10. It costs ten times as much to catch that same bug or code error at the QA level, another ten-fold increase in costs to catch it at the UAT level and a hundred-fold at the Systems Integration level.
Many Developers are still testing their code against homegrown, limited functionality host simulators, which are of benefit to the developer, but these homegrown and often undocumented tools are simply another island of technology within the organization which do not benefit the enterprise as a whole.
The Quality Assurance group has a well-defined process for testing, that is upgraded manually as each new application arrives, with a substantial dependence on the 'Legacy knowledge' of their long-term staff.
User Acceptance testing is seen as the last point of protection for the organization in terms of rolling out changes to applications and systems. Although they utilize well-defined scripts and documented processes, it is very time consuming and error-prone because of reliance on manual processes.
Organizations must make sure code errors or bugs, do not slip into the production environment where the costs and damage to the organization can be catastrophic, both financially and in terms of the organization's reputation or brand.
So how does Lexcel automate this process and extend the benefits of automation throughout the Development, Systems, UAT and QA groups?
Lexcel's products give Developers desktop access to a host simulator or transaction generation application so they can test code more often. Validating code more frequently - every 10 lines versus every 200 - will realize enormous gains in productivity. Developers are able to produce more error free code - Faster!
QA will have access to the same scripting and test scenario setups that are used by UAT. QA will catch more issues earlier, costs will be lower, scripts run more often, and smaller units of changed code can be tested against a known and approved script.
The Systems Group has access to the full set of certification and test scripts used by UAT, as well as their own base and modified scripts for existing applications and programs already in production.
|